Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. All funds up to $2,979,690.04 in Solidif vAccount in the name of Bytechip LLC, beneficial owner Yujun Wu et al
as 2:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All funds up to $2,979,690.04 in Solidif vAccount in the name of Bytechip LLC, beneficial owner Yujun Wu and All funds up to $2,029,765.39 in Solidif vAccount in the name of Gatcha Pictures LLC, beneficial owner Xuan Du
Claimant:
Bytechip LLC, Gatcha Pictures LLC, Yujun Wu and others
Not Yet Classified:
US Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wu v. Passive Wealth Builders, et al
as 2:2021cv02205
Defendant:
Joshua Jackson, Passive Wealth Builders and RocketSell, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eugene Wu
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Martichuski et al v. Wu et al [TV2]
as 3:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
John Martichuski and JMI, Inc.
Defendant:
David Hui Wu, Bobby Chen Sabas and Hospitality International Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Chanel, Inc. v. Haoyuan et al
as 2:2009cv02809
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Huang Haoyuan, Stephaine Du, Xiaoqin Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Bridgeport Music Inc, et al v. Careers-BMG Publish, et al
as 3:2001cv00935
Plaintiff:
Bridgeport Music, Inc. , Westbound Records, Inc. and Nine Records, Inc.
Defendant:
Wu Tang Publishing, Inc., Loud Records, LLC , Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
