Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Archibald v. Mulder et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Alan Nigel Archibald, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Mulder, Martin Neofotis, Eric Copposs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wycoff v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Steven Wycoff
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jeff Barteff, Mike Heinricy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollingsworth v. Karberg et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Kris Karberg, Michelle Waddle, Tracy Dietsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Anamosa State Penitentiary
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Nathaniel Keith
Defendant:
Anamosa State Penitentiary, Michelle Waddle, Kris Karberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Losee v. Skinner et al
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jack Losee
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, Kristofer Karberg, Michelle Waddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Peterson et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Adam Derr, John Hawk, Michelle Waddle and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Daniels
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asbury v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00319
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Asbury
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bustillos v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00322
Plaintiff:
Sabastian Bustillos
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00321
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Gonzalez
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloch v. ISP et al
as 4:2018cv00324
Defendant:
ISP, SURC Committee, Chapel Charles Marmer and others
Plaintiff:
Demetreis Bloch
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
