Cases 1 - 10 of 21
LAWRENCE v. ARANGO et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
SANTARIO DIAMANTE LAWRENCE
Defendant:
JEWSHUA ARANGO, MAJOR WADE HARRIS and SOU THAO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2021cv00006
Defendant:
CHIEF KEITH BROOKS, MAJOR WADE HARRIS and SHERIFF JOE CHAPMAN
Plaintiff:
TRACY EDWARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWRENCE v. PECORE et al
as 3:2020cv00055
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHN MINTON, CAPTAIN SCOTT PECORE, MAJOR WADE HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
SANTARIO LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICKARD v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2019cv00091
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SCOTT PECORE, MAJOR WADE HARRIS, CAPTAIN JOHN MINTON and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN RICKARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHEAT v. DAY et al
as 3:2018cv00097
Defendant:
MAJOR WADE HARRIS, OFFICER J MOUTON, OFFICER J DAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WHEAT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. BENTON et al
as 3:2018cv00082
Defendant:
OFFICER MARSHALL, CORRECT HEALTH SERVICES, MAJOR WADE HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY EDWARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2018cv00017
Defendant:
JOE CHAPMAN, KEITH BROOKS, MONK and others
Plaintiff:
MONTREZ TIRELL GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITED et al v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE WHITED, JOHN KELSEY CAIN, VI, JOHN CHRISTOPHER CALHOUN, II and others
Defendant:
JOE CHAPMAN, KEITH BROOKS, MONK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWREY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BLAKE LOWREY and ANTHONY OF LOWREY FAMILY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA, KATHENE LUMSDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
DOTSON v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
OMAR J DOTSON
Defendant:
JOE CHAPMAN, MINTON and WADE HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
