Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Charles Jones v. Kent County, MI, et al
as 23-1866
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES JONES, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Wade Jones
Defendant:
KENT COUNTY, MI, jointly and severally
Defendant / Appellant:
NURSE MELISSA FURNACE, jointly and severally, NURSE CHAD RICHARD GOETTERMAN, jointly and severally and NURSE JAMES AUGUST MOLLO, jointly and severally
Jones et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv13900
Plaintiff:
Wade Jones and Patricia Jones
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Nathaniel Jones
as 21-1117
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHANIEL WADE JONES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv03964
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN WADE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Harvey et al
as 1:2019cv03729
Plaintiff:
Everett Wade Jones
Defendant:
Husky, Bell, Beck Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cooper et al
as 1:2019cv03698
Defendant:
Perez, Buros, Buffington and others
Plaintiff:
Everett Wade Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv22573
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
JONES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv02541
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WADE JONES
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Jones v. DeMill et al
as 2:2016cv01085
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Jones
Defendant:
FNU DeMill, Gary Herbert, Scott Crowther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Nathaniel Jone
as 16-1745
Movant:
In re: NATHANIEL WADE JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
