Cases 11 - 18 of 18
STEWARD v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY STEWARD
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
VLADIMIRSKY et al v. MCCORMICK AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2015cv02215
Plaintiff:
JULIA VLADIMIRSKY and BERNARD ORTIZ
Defendant:
MCCORMICK AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED, WAL-MART STORES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
IN RE: MCCORMICK & COMPANY, INC., PEPPER PRODUCTS MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
as 1:2015mc01825
Plaintiff:
RHONDA DUPLER, HOLLY MARSH, RYAN SCOTT BUNTING and others
Defendant:
MCCORMICK & COMPANY, INC. , WAL-MART STORES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
as 1:2015mc01267
Petitioner:
CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Respondent:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Movant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
RAHAMAN et al v. J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00619
Plaintiff:
ABDUR RAHAMAN and MAHAMUDUL HASAN HRIDOY
Defendant:
J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., CHILDREN'S PLACE, WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ODEMNS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01790
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LEE ODEMNS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , BET , VIVENDI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. WEST COAST CHOPPERS, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01787
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
WEST COAST CHOPPERS, INC., VANILLA GORILLA L.P., JESSE GREGORY JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
