Cases 41 - 50 of 344
Gaddis et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Tammy Gaddis, Teegan Gaddis and T. G.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tobias v. Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP
as 4:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Falicia Tobias
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Moreland v. Wal-Mart Inc
as 4:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Richard Moreland
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Bennett v. Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P. et al
as 4:2021cv00871
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Bennett, II
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P., Case Snow Management, Inc. and Turf Boss LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knutter v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 5:2021cv06164
Plaintiff:
William A. Knutter
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP doing business as Walmart Supercenter and Todd Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP et al
as 4:2021cv00858
Plaintiff:
Keyatta F Bell, Key-trina J Bell, Dineria F Bell and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP and Unknown Doe Agents 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karizamimba v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
Corinne Karizamimba
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karizamimba v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 4:2021cv01391
Plaintiff:
Corinne Karizamimba
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv03237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
