Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Walgreen Co. et al v. Caremark RX, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00744
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co., Walgreen Co., Walgreen Co. and others
Defendant:
Caremark RX, Inc., Caremark Rx, LLC, CaremarkPCS Alabama Mail Pharmacy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ezell et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2008cv00161
Plaintiff:
Martha Ezell and Richard Ezell
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Counter Claimant:
Walgreen Co.
Counter Defendant:
Martha Ezell and Richard Ezell
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Larkins et al v. Walgreen Co
as 2:2008cv00184
Plaintiff:
Leslie D Larkins and Nicky Larkins
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Cupp v. Atico International et al
as 2:2008cv00159
Plaintiff:
Michael Cupp
Defendant:
Atico International, Atico International, East West Distributing and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Squires v. FKA Distributing Co. et al
as 3:2008cv00427
Plaintiff:
Kathryn A. Squires, Kathryn A. Squires and Kathryn A. Squires
Defendant:
FKA Distributing Co. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Moseley et al v. Walgreen Co
as 2:2008cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael T Moseley and Deanna Moseley
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Clark v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 2:2008cv02088
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Clark and Michael R. Clark
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Walgreen, Dyersburg, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Massi v. Walgreen Co. Inc
as 3:2007cv00346
Plaintiff:
Clay Massi
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Byrd v. Walgreen Co.
as 1:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Byrd
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
