Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips et al v. Bittick et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III and D.A.P.
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Bittick, Patrice Walls, Officer Unknown Lawton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. The Glad Products Company
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Chris Wall
Defendant:
The Glad Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rios Rosa v. Sanders et al
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Angel Rios Rosa
Defendant:
Unknown Sanders and Jerry Walls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. USA
as 4:2023cv01191
Petitioner:
Zamika Walls
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Phillips v. Walls et al
as 4:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Patrice Walls, #1 Publishing Company, Amazon Co. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Wall
as 4:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Honor Hart
Defendant:
Christopher Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Johnson v. Stange et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Anna Prichyle, Lisa Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center Chapel et al
as 2:2023cv04003
Plaintiff:
Jamaal J Walls
Defendant:
Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center Chapel and Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
