Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 903
In re: Payton
as 24-3044
Petitioner: In re: WALTER ALMON PAYTON
Respondent: STATE OF KANSAS
Walter v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv02082
Plaintiff: Edward Gary Walter
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walters v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00179
Petitioner: Winston Ray Walters
Respondent: Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cheadle v. Dinwiddie
as 24-6019
Petitioner: DARRYL A. CHEADLE
Respondent: WALTER DINWIDDIE, Warden
Hruska v. Buchanan et al
as 2:2024cv02048
Plaintiff: Christoper D. Hruska
Defendant: Walter R. Buchanan and Poseidon Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Klink et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Lachele Klink and Matthew Walters
Defendant: USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bartles (PS) v. Sazama et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff: Dustin Bartles
Defendant: No Named Defendant, James Sazama, Jackie Stimac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meetze v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv01104
Plaintiff: Walter Meetze
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Maldonado-Magno, et al v. Garland
as 23-9604
Petitioner: WALTER MALDONADO-MAGNO, ANDREA UCHUYPOMA-PALOMINO and LOAN MALDONADO-UCHUYPOMA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?