Cases 41 - 50 of 524
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McDougald v. May et al
as 3:2022cv01058
Plaintiff:
Jerone McDougald
Defendant:
Harold May, Mr. Walters, Major Mr. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Feaster v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Watson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02016
Plaintiff:
Walter Watson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burfitt v. May et al
as 3:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Burfitt and Lawrence Burfitt
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, Deputy Warden Ryan Walters, Unit Manager Pettiway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kutyba v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Walter John Kutyba
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Walters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
Randy Walters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
