Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Thompson v. Springhetti et al
as 2:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jason Thompson
Defendant:
Scott Springhetti, Luke McKee, Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alford v. Rice et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Walter Herbert Rice, Jeffrey R McQuiston and Donald R Reidman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Walter
as 2:2023cv03981
Plaintiff:
Tremain Hogan
Defendant:
Craig Walter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magwood v. DeWine et al
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Shane Magwood
Defendant:
Gov Mike DeWine, Warden Kim Anderson, Major Jack Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magwood v. DeWine et al
as 2:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Shane Magwood
Defendant:
Gov Mike DeWine, Warden Kim Henderson, Major Jack Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feaster v. Sammons et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Walter Sammons, Officer Norman, Officer Carver R and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Teodosio et al
as 5:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jackie J. Taylor
Defendant:
Thomas A. Teodosio, Sherri Bevan Walsh and Walter T. Madison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Harris v. Black
as 1:2022cv02116
Petitioner:
Walter Harris
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Easley v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
D. Easley
Defendant:
Jori Anderson, Ms. Shaffer, Kelly Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Glaze v. Morgan et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
