Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,642
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv01537
Petitioner: Robert K. Decker
Respondent: Warden Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flowers v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01538
Plaintiff: Demetrius Flowers
Defendant: Warden Galloway, Sgt. Bernard, C/O Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Rodriguez v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50233
Petitioner: Julian Martinez-Rodriguez
Respondent: Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Szpila v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01521
Plaintiff: Rhyian Szpila
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Warden - FCI Greenville et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01520
Plaintiff: Kari Ann Peters
Defendant: Warden - FCI Greenville, Amber Fitzpatrick and Ms. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Solis v. Yazoo City USP et al
as 1:2024cv04905
Petitioner: Leonel Solis
Respondent: Yazoo City USP and FCI Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Huaco v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50225
Petitioner: Alberto Canales Huaco
Respondent: Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Njus v. Warden McClean County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01154
Petitioner: Joel Njus
Respondent: Warden McClean County Detention Center
Not Yet Classified: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Truitt
as 1:2024cv04703
Plaintiff: Tony Williams
Defendant: Warden Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benedict v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50214
Plaintiff: William Byron Benedict
Defendant: Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?