Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hill v. Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility
as 1:2017cv01801
Petitioner:
Dustin Hill
Respondent:
Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Velarde v. Archuleta, et al
as 15-1250
Petitioner - Appellant:
WIGHTY W. VELARDE
Respondent - Appellee:
LOU ARCHULETA, Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Owens v. Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2015cv01383
Petitioner:
Dante Owens
Respondent:
Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Triggs v. State of Colorado, et al
as 14-1213
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES SIDNEY TRIGGS
Respondent - Appellee:
THE STATE OF COLORADO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and LOU ARCHULETA, Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility
Johnson v. Medina, et al
as 13-1324
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LEE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden Fremont Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Martinez v. DeCesaro, et al
as 11-1130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL LOUIS MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY DECESARO, Grievance Officer, individually and in his Official Capacity, RAE TIMME, Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility, individually and in her Official Capacity and SUSAN JONES, Warden, CSP and CCF, individually and in her Official Capacity
Ellis v. Estep, et al
as 10-1295
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID ELLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
AL ESTEP, Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility and JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Soeken v. State of Colorado, et al
as 07-1516
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC LYNN SOEKEN
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, AL ESTEP, Warden Fremont Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
