Cases 1 - 10 of 691
Smiley v Phillip et al
as 2:2024cv01192
Defendant:
Julie Ludwig, Dr Phillip Wheatley, Hormes Michelle and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Smiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio-Martinez, Jose v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00648
Petitioner:
Jose Alfonso Martinez-Antonio and Jose Antonio-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King, Aerion v. Rutledge et al
as 3:2024cv00503
Defendant:
Lt. Lloyd, Dr. Stange, RN Bonnie and others
Plaintiff:
Aerion King
Unknown:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Cahak
as 2:2024cv01164
Petitioner:
Marco A Lopez, Sr
Respondent:
Warden Brian Cahak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hyatt v. Evers et al
as 2:2024cv01162
Defendant:
Tim Malchow, James Schwochert, Cindy O'Donnell and others
Plaintiff:
Jason J Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corrales-Gonzalez, German v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00638
Petitioner:
German Corrales-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Underwood v. Cahak
as 2:2024cv01145
Petitioner:
Robert Richard Underwood
Respondent:
Warden Brian Cahak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Noble et al
as 2:2024cv01136
Defendant:
Compliance Officer Prea, Jon Noble, Security Director Pusich and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Emmerich
as 3:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
Cordney Thurman
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burnette v. Tegels et al
as 2:2024cv00886
Defendant:
Elizabeth Tegels, Mark Hennessy, Addam Martinson and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel A Burnette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
