Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Kovacic v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
William T Kovacic
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Cassandra Abney, Bethany Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Donnell Devonte Sanders
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabagua v. Eplett et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Cabagua
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplett, Kevin Carr, J Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
LaMondre Moore
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tucker v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01468
Petitioner:
Gregory Tucker
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sease v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01388
Petitioner:
Daniel D Sease
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avery v. Godlewski et al
as 2:2023cv01271
Plaintiff:
Kelley Avery
Defendant:
Sarah Godlewski, Warden Cheryl Eplett, Brad Hompe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01136
Petitioner:
James Earl Norwood
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01040
Petitioner:
Ronald D Morgan
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fowler, Kenneth v. Eplett, Cheryl et al
as 3:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fowler
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplett, Julie Ludwig, Tracy Thompson and others
Not Classified By Court:
OSCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
