Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Vinson v. Claiborne Parish Detention Center
as 5:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Contravious Vinson
Defendant:
Warden Claiborne Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederic Birgans v. Johnny Sumlin, Warden
as 15-30450
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERIC LUBRON BIRGANS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNY SUMLIN, Warden, Claiborne Parish Detention Center
Arnold Curtis v. Johnny Sumlin, Warden
as 14-30457
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARNOLD BENNETT CURTIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHNNY SUMLIN, Warden Claiborne Parish Detention Center
Bell v. Claiborne Parish Detention Center
as 5:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bell
Defendant:
Warden Claiborne Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curtis v. Claiborne Parish Detention Center
as 3:2014cv00544
Plaintiff:
Arnold B Curtis
Defendant:
Warden Claiborne Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee v. Claiborne Parish Detention Center
as 5:2013cv03107
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lee
Defendant:
Warden Claiborne Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arnold Curtis v. Johnny Sumlin, Warden
as 13-31016
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARNOLD BENNETT CURTIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHNNY SUMLIN, Warden Claiborne Parish Detention Center
Arnold Curtis v. Johnny Sumlin, Warden
as 13-30565
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARNOLD BENNETT CURTIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHNNY SUMLIN, Warden, Claiborne Parish Detention Center
William Manning v. Johnny Sumlin
as 13-30255
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM TROY MANNING
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHNNY SUMLIN, Warden, Claiborne Parish Detention Center
Lathan v. Claiborne Parish Detention Center
as 3:2012cv03160
Plaintiff:
Paul G Lathan, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Claiborne Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
