Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Rivas v. Koenig et al
as 4:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mendoza Rivas
Defendant:
Warden Craig Koenig and L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Diaz et al
as 4:2022cv06511
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Warden Craig Koenig and J. Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez et al v. State of California et al
as 4:2022cv04593
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hernandez and Johnny Ibarra
Defendant:
State of California and CTF Warden Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. State of California et al
as 4:2022cv02721
Plaintiff:
Jason M Vargas
Defendant:
State of California, Warden Craig Koenig, D. Metcalf and others
Intervenor:
William Milton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Koenig et al
as 5:2022cv00881
Plaintiff:
Lamarr F Brown
Defendant:
Warden Craig Koenig and L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Posson et al
as 5:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Glenn Davis
Defendant:
S. Posson, M. Sweet, Steven Posson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dalton v. Koenig
as 4:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Alvin Henry Dalton
Defendant:
Warden Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2021cv09586
Plaintiff:
Mr. Talib Williams and Dimario Pickford
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR Kathleen Allison, Warden Craig Koenig and others
Intervenor:
Milton William
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Chad Giese v. Craig Koenig
as 2:2021cv08535
Petitioner:
Charles Chad Giese
Respondent:
Warden Craig Koenig and Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dalton v. Koenig
as 4:2021cv08241
Plaintiff:
Alvin Henry Dalton
Defendant:
Warden Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
