Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nasby v. Nevada ex rel NDOC et al
as 3:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Warden D. Nevens, Tara Carpenter, D. Tristan and others
Plaintiff:
Brendan James Nasby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. NDOC et al
as 2:2019cv00057
Defendant:
Warden D. Nevens, D. Tristan, D. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Neven et al
as 2:2017cv02457
Defendant:
Lt Ferber, Knight, Srgt Madeo and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian L Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhymes v. Aranas et al
as 3:2015cv00592
Defendant:
Aranas, James G. Cox, Nash and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rhymes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Pugh et al
as 2:2014cv00752
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and Warden D. Nevens
Petitioner:
Donnell P. Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. Nevens et al
as 3:2014cv00099
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Warden D. Nevens and Lisa Walsh
Plaintiff:
Tashaun S. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Nevens et al
as 2:2014cv00240
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden D. Nevens
Petitioner:
Donnell P. Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. Nevens et al
as 3:2013cv00710
Defendant:
James G. Coxs, Inspector General, Warden D. Nevens and others
Plaintiff:
Tashaun S. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vontress v. Nevens et al
as 2:2013cv00838
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden D. Nevens
Petitioner:
George Vontress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beatty v. Nevens et al
as 2:2013cv00764
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden D. Nevens
Petitioner:
Sterling P. Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
