Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BLOCKER v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv21391
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY, SUPERIOR CRIMINAL COURTS, DEPUTY WARDEN CARBARER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv21346
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL, WARDEN KELLY and DEPUTY WARDEN CARBERER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv21208
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL, WARDEN KELLY and DEPUTY WARDEN CARBERER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv21114
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY, CAPTAIN TROUT and SGT. GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv20338
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL, WARDEN KELLY and DEPUTY WARDEN CARBERER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv15988
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL, WARDEN KELLY and DEPUTY WARDEN CARBERER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON et al v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv04688
Plaintiff:
MARCHESE JACKSON, MICHAEL HAYES, DARRYL HAMPTON and others
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY and ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv04574
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL, WARDEN KELLY, CAPTAIN MADLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONCEPCION v. FIERRO et al
as 1:2021cv08292
Plaintiff:
ANGEL CONCEPCION
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY, SERGEANT M. OMEDIO and OFFICER M. FIERRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
