Cases filed in New York
Li v. Warden MDC Brooklyn
as 1:2023cv05662
Petitioner: Wei Li
Respondent: Warden MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Doe v. United States of America et al
as 2:2019cv01239
Defendant: John Doe #2, Office of Internal Affairs, John Doe #1, Special Agent, Office of the Inspector General, Michael Carvajal, Former Regional Director, Northeast Region, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Warden MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2019cv01526
Respondent: Judges U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Attorney General of the USA Director and others
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Owen v. Warden MDC Brooklyn
as 1:2018cv03603
Respondent: Warden MDC Brooklyn
Petitioner: Marcus Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Warden MDC Brooklyn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00460
Petitioner: Mark Green
Respondent: United States Attorneys Office and Warden MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Warden MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2015cv00102
Petitioner: Mark Green
Respondent: U.S. Attorneys Office For NY and Warden MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chen v. Warden MDC Brooklyn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv04908
Petitioner: John E. Chen
Respondent: Warden MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chen v. Warden MDC Brooklyn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv04658
Petitioner: John E. Chen
Respondent: Warden MDC Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?