Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Allen Simpson v. Dean Dove, Warden
as 16-31142
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALLEN SIMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DEAN DOVE, Warden, Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Randy Davis v. Dean Dove, Warden
as 15-30444
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY PAUL DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
DEAN DOVE, Warden, Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Tyrone Washington v. Dean Dove, Warden
as 15-30434
Petitioner - Appellant:
TYRONE WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
DEAN DOVE, Warden, Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Randy Davis v. Dean Dove, Warden, et al
as 15-30425
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY PAUL DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
DEAN DOVE, Warden, Natchitoches Parish Detention Center and DEPUTY ROBERTSON
Williams v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
as 5:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Williams
Defendant:
Warden Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
as 3:2014cv00723
Defendant:
Warden Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Allen Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
as 5:2014cv02523
Plaintiff:
Allen Simpson
Defendant:
Warden Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuels v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
as 5:2014cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ontario Samuels
Defendant:
Warden Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randy Davis v. Warden, Natchitoches Parish
as 13-31164
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY PAUL DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, NATCHITOCHES PARISH DETENTION CENTER
Davis v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
as 5:2013cv00546
Plaintiff:
Randy Paul Davis
Defendant:
Warden Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
