Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Alexander v. NDOC et al
as 2:2015cv02244
Plaintiff:
Demetri Alexander
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Dr Hanf, Dante Famy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv01090
Defendant:
Adams, Aranas, Calderwood and others
Plaintiff:
George L. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Cox et al
as 3:2015cv00115
Defendant:
James Greg Cox, Leavett and Warden Neven
Plaintiff:
Henry Frometa Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tagle v. Neven et al
as 2:2015cv00214
Respondent:
Warden Neven and The Attorney General of the State of Additional Respondent
Petitioner:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cardenas v. Neven et al
as 2:2014cv02026
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden Neven
Petitioner:
Joel Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vontress v. Nevens
as 2:2014cv00984
Respondent:
Warden Nevens
Petitioner:
George Vontress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Neven et al
as 3:2014cv00101
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Nurse Gregg, H.D.S.P. Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. Williams et al
as 2:2013cv01899
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hooks
Defendant:
Warden Neven, Richardson, Stacey Starks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. Neven et al
as 2:2013cv01796
Defendant:
Ted Hanf, Warden Neven, Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Cox et al
as 2:2013cv01542
Defendant:
James Greg Cox, Fierro, Mr. Fletcher and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Frometa Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
