Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 46
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant: Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROACH v. EMMONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff: EARL ROACH
Defendant: WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. EMMONS
as 4:2024cv00001
Petitioner: Vince Martinez Harris
Respondent: Warden SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roach v. Emmons
as 3:2023cv00247
Plaintiff: Earl Roach
Defendant: Warden Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sailem v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff: Steven T. Sailem
Defendant: Tyrone Oliver, Warden Shawn Emmons, Deputy Warden Joshua Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Emmons
as 4:2023cv00151
Plaintiff: Micki Brown
Defendant: Warden Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. EMMONS
as 1:2023cv00092
Petitioner: ANTONIO DEUNTA BROWN
Respondent: WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00074
Plaintiff: Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant: Warden Shawn Emmons, Joshua Jones and Jeffery Balled
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Emmons et al
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff: Danny Ray Bennett
Defendant: Warden Shawn Emmons, Staff Security and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOLANO v. EMMONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00032
Plaintiff: ANGEL SOLANO
Defendant: Warden SHAWN EMMONS and Cert Officer DOMINIQUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?