Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Silvas v. Warner et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Julian Galvan Silvas, Jr
Defendant:
Lt. Warner, Sgt. Guiterez, Sgt. Syler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Seibold et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
John Peterson, III
Defendant:
LT. S. Seibold, Msgt. T. Warner and Sgt. A. Ligon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv02032
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Dr. Davis, Lt. Relser, Durelle Cardiff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Rader et al
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Ethan Thomas Brown
Defendant:
Robert J. Rader, Raye Carnes, Ktisha Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez v. Griffis et al
as 7:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Michael George Valdez
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Griffis, Chief Deputy Eddie Mancha, MSGT Taelor Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Griffis et al
as 7:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jacob Alex Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Griffis, Sgt. T. Warner, Lt. M. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Griffis et al
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jacob Alex Johnson
Defendant:
Mike Griffis, Corporal J. Toombs, Z. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02459
Petitioner:
Gary Wayne Warner
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Diaz III v. Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Angel L Diaz III
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office, K-9 Unit, Sheriff on Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Gary Wayne Warner
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
