Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wash v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01244
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Dameon Lamont Wash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sager et al v. LVNV -Baltimore Social Security Administrations et al
as 2:2016cv01706
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Albanese and Margaret E. Sager, II
Defendant:
Elks Club, LV, NV and Wash DC FBI, LVNV -Baltimore Social Security Administrations and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Stafford v. Wash
as 2:2014cv02112
Plaintiff:
Mathew Stafford
Defendant:
John Wash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Charles Burton v. David Wash Burn et al
as 2:2014cv09105
Defendant:
David Wash Burn, Californai Department of Insurance, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Dr Charles Burton
Stafford v. Wash
as 1:2014cv01791
Plaintiff:
Mathew Stafford
Defendant:
John Wash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Erica Baker et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01840
Plaintiff:
Erica Baker, Sara Barker, Christina Bell and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Does
Christopher Jackson v. Los Angeles Police Department Pacific Division et al
as 2:2013cv01595
Defendant:
Thomas Corte, ERA Matilla Realty, Thomas Ennis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Downing v. Wanchek et al
as 2:2007cv01599
Plaintiff:
Larry Downing
Defendant:
Robert Wanchek, Blue Beacon and Corning Truck Wash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Downing v. Wanchek et al
as 2:2007at00719
Plaintiff:
Larry Downing
Defendant:
Robert Wanchek, Blue Beacon and Corning Truck Wash
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Smith, et. al v. Wash Depot Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2007cv00353
Defendant:
Wash Depot Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alisa Marshall Smith and Sean Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
