Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Watson v. Fairbairn, et al
as 23-1392
Petitioner / Appellant:
WARREN D. WATSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF COLORADO
Watson v. Starr
as 1:2023cv01219
Petitioner:
Pierre Watson
Respondent:
M. Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Watson v. Fairbairn et al
as 1:2022cv02695
Petitioner:
Warren Dale Watson
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson (ID 62184) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2022cv03056
Plaintiff:
James Watson
Defendant:
Dan Schnurr and Jeff Zmuda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Daniel Watson
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobos v. Central New Mexico Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Danny Cobos
Defendant:
Central New Mexico Correctional Facility, R Lucero, FNU Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pino v. Central New Mexico Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Bennie Pino
Defendant:
Central New Mexico Correctional Facility, R Lucero, FNU Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. Clergett et al
as 1:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Daquan Wagner
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Clergett, Haver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2021cv03245
Plaintiff:
Daniel Glen Watson
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Escamilla-Watson v. El Paso County Criminal Justice Center
as 1:2021cv03244
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dreamer Escamilla-Watson
Defendant:
El Paso County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
