Cases 1 - 10 of 493
Livesay v. BNSF Railway Co.
as 4:2024cv00422
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Co.
Plaintiff:
Wayne Livesay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Chesser v. Harpe
as 5:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
Brian Wayne Chesser
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolin v. Oklahoma, State of et al.
as 6:2024cv00190
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of and Kevin Stitt
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bolin
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Jones v. Stephens County Jail
as 5:2024cv00576
Defendant:
Jenny LNU, Javier Martinez, Wayne McKinney and others
Plaintiff:
Dominic R Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Self v. Harpe
as 4:2024cv00311
Petitioner:
Derrick Wayne Self
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ketcher v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Ketcher
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pearce v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Phillip Wayne Pearce
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hooks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Elzie Wayne Hooks, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
Joe Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coker v. Stitt et al
as 5:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Coker
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Kameron Harvanek, Matthew Sinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
