Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Mangram v. Bennett et al
as 2:2009cv00203
Petitioner:
Matthew L. Mangram
Respondent:
Wayne Bennett, Newsome, Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bacon v. Bennett
as 2:2009cv00112
Petitioner:
Delmus Kelvin Bacon
Respondent:
Wayne Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharon v. Bennett
as 2:2009cv00106
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Sharon
Respondent:
Wayne Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENNETT et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv73993
Plaintiff:
WAYNE BENNETT, JERE MARIE MCDONALD, RODNEY B. BENNETT and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
McCumbers v. Perdue et al
as 2:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen McCumbers
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Jerry Keen, Wayne Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dees v. Bennett et al
as 2:2009cv00036
Plaintiff:
Ernest C. Dees, Jr.
Defendant:
Wayne Bennett, Ron Corbett, Louise Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Dwight L. Allen
Defendant:
Michelle Hamilton, Michael Perry, Robert Guy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gardner v. Bennett
as 2:2009cv00034
Petitioner:
Richard D. Gardner, Jr.
Respondent:
Wayne Bennett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dees v. Williams et al
as 2:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Ernest C. Dees, Jr.
Defendant:
Amanda Williams, Tom Moree, Wayne Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lamb v. Bennett et al
as 2:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lamb
Defendant:
Wayne Bennett, Public Defenders Office and District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
