Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Shorter et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01874
Plaintiff:
Bernard Shorter and Gertrude Shorter
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., E. L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCURDY et al v. JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv76815
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MCCURDY, MICHAEL J. MCCURDY and ANNA MCCURDY
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., E.L. STEBBING & CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lee et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00798
Plaintiff:
William J. Lee, Sr. and Shirley Lee
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., E. L. Stebbing & Co., Inc., Hampshire Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCurdy et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02681
Plaintiff:
Michael J. McCurdy and Anna McCurdy
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
RPM, Inc., Crane Co., JH France Refractories Co. and others
Cross Defendant:
Columbia Heating Products Co., Crane Co., Georgia-Pacific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Warfield et al v. Northrop Gruman Ship Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01870
Plaintiff:
James Samuel Warfield, James Samuel Warfield, Alda Smith-Warfield and others
Defendant:
Northrop Gruman Ship Systems, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., General Refactories, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
RAVER v. JOHN CRANE - HOUDAILLE, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62858
Plaintiff:
MARY R. RAVER, MARY R. RAVER and MARY R. RAVER
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE - HOUDAILLE, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO., E.L. STEBBING & CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
