Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. Wayne Stenehjem
as 3:2017cv00062
Petitioner:
Marlin Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Wayne Stenehjem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramsey v. Birtsch et al
as 3:2014cv00073
Petitioner:
Terry D. Ramsey
Respondent:
Leanne Birtsch, Wayne Stenehjem and State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell Holbach v. North Dakota State Hospital, et al
as 14-1917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mitchell David Holbach
Defendant - Appellee:
North Dakota State Hospital, Alex Schweitzer, Administrator, Dr. Allan and others
Mitchell David Holbach v. State of North Dakota, et al
as 13-3417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mitchell David Holbach
Defendant - Appellee:
State of North Dakota and Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General
Mitchell Holbach v. Wayne Stenehjem
as 13-1839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mitchell David Holbach
Defendant - Appellee:
Wayne Stenehjem, North Dakota Attorney General
Jones v. Stenehjem
as 3:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
Robert Doyal Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Wayne Stenehjem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holbach v. State of North Dakota et al
as 3:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Mitchell David Holbach
Defendant:
State of North Dakota and Wayne Stenehjem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corman v. Stenehjem et al
as 3:2012cv00091
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ray Corman
Defendant:
Wayne Stenehjem, Haley Wamstad, Andrew Eyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mikal White Mountain v. Douglas Webber, etc., et al
as 08-3371
Petitioner - Appellant:
Mikal J. White Mountain
Respondent - Appellee:
Douglas Webber, Warden (S.D.), Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General of North Dakota and Leann K. Bertsch, Director, North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 3:2007cv00096
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Defendant:
Warden Hudson, Michael B Mukasey, Kent Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
