Cases 21 - 30 of 214
Rindahl, Randy v. Pristen, J. et al
as 4:2013cv04078
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
J. Pristen, J. Smith, Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strohfus v. Bowers et al
as 4:2013cv04067
Plaintiff:
Toby Joseph Strohfus
Defendant:
Heather Bowers, Douglas Weber, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gard v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2013cv04062
Plaintiff:
Rex Gard
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Doug Weber, Bob Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowles v. Dooley et al
as 5:2013cv05039
Petitioner:
Wade Elliot Bowles
Respondent:
Warden Dooley, Douglas Weber and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carothers v. Weber
as 4:2013cv04026
Plaintiff:
Derrick Carothers
Defendant:
Douglas Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Morgan v. Hughes County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2013cv03012
Plaintiff:
Thomas Morgan
Defendant:
Hughes County Sheriffs Office and Douglas Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scheetz v. Weber et al
as 4:2013cv04011
Petitioner:
Daryl T. Scheetz
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lohnes v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04196
Petitioner:
Burton Lohnes
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chambers v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04191
Plaintiff:
Alvin Roy Chambers
Defendant:
Warden Douglas Weber and E.R. Regier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creek v. Weber
as 4:2012cv04188
Petitioner:
Clayton Sheldon Creek
Respondent:
Douglas L. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
