Cases 71 - 80 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00037
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aurel v. Bertie Do. James et al
as 1:2020cv03546
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Corizon Provides Healthcare, Warden R. Weber and Bertie Do. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Corporal v. Pennington et al
as 1:2020cv03357
Defendant:
Butler, Warden Weber, Officer Donaldson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Corporal
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Cason v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 8:2020cv03045
Defendant:
Lt. Smith, Maryland Division Of Corrections, Major Llewellen and others
Plaintiff:
Marc S. Cason
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Corporal v. Warden Weber et al
as 1:2020cv02681
Defendant:
F. Taylor, Warden Weber, Assistant Warden Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Corporal
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Canter v. Warden Ronald Weber et al
as 8:2020cv01894
Defendant:
Warden Ronald Weber, Jamal Simms, CO Hedrick and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Maree Canter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wiggins v. Green et al
as 8:2020cv00909
Defendant:
Lieutenant James Smith, Warden Ronald Weber, Correctional Officer John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Corporal v. Weber
as 8:2020cv00950
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Corporal
Defendant:
Warden Weber
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Corporal v. Carr et al
as 8:2020cv00534
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Corporal
Defendant:
H. Carr, Commissioner Hill, Warden Weber and others
Interested Party:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Parrish Bey v. Weber et al
as 8:2020cv00302
Defendant:
Staff, M. Butler, Warden A. Weber and others
Plaintiff:
Dant'e L. Parrish Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
