Cases 1 - 10 of 19
ZHENG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
ZHONG WEI ZHENG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
RooR International BV et al v. Tobacco Shop of Mishawaka LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00115
Plaintiff:
Sream Inc and RooR International BV
Defendant:
Wei Zheng, Tobacco Shop of Mishawaka, LLC d/b/a Low Bob's Express and Tobacco Shop of Mishawaka LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05442
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zhao et al v. Extremely Bright International Investment Limited et al
as 1:2018cv08257
Plaintiff:
Yun Zhao and Zijian Wu
Defendant:
Wei Zheng and Extremely Bright International Investment Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Wang
as 17-2220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth King, Yien-Koo King, Soon Huat, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew Wang, Shou-Kung Wang, Bao Wu Tang and others
Wei Zheng, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71512
Petitioner:
WEI ZHENG and XIAOWEI ZHENG, AKA Xiao Wei Zheng
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
