Cases 11 - 20 of 178
Warren v. Arlington Police Dept et al
as 4:2023cv00855
Plaintiff:
Byron J. Warren
Defendant:
Arlington Police Dept, Post Office and Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner v. Well Path Medical Staff et al
as 5:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Skinner
Defendant:
Well Path Medical Staff, Dr. NFN Reddick, E Posey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mongeau v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Steven Mongeau
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe and Well Path Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Wells et al
as 4:2023cv02359
Plaintiff:
John Davis Bernard, Jr.
Defendant:
Clinton E. Wells, Jr., Robert Sobal, Julio Joglar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whatley v. Wells Fargo et al
as 4:2023cv01621
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Whatley
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, Jeanette Villanueva, Alex Bermudez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Parole Board et al
as 4:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Parole Board, Nicole Standerly and Wells Fargo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Wells Fargo et al
as 4:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Xavier Davis
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maida v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Maida
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
