Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LINCOLN et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv05764
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN, III and MICHAEL N. MASTORIS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. , KIRN POWERS, LLC, SARAH E. POWERS, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. MASTORIS et al
as 3:2013cv05008
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
MICHAEL MASTORIS and MRS. MICHAEL MASTORIS
Movant:
CHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAGE v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA AS. et al
as 3:2012cv00777
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA AS., LUKE ANDERSEN and HELENA ANDERSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
IGNACIO v. THE U.S. DOLLAR et al
as 1:2008cv02136
Plaintiff:
TEVIS R. IGNACIO
Defendant:
THE U.S. DOLLAR, THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
