Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Costello v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 3:2021cv01388
Defendant:
Milford Law LLC doing business as Kapusta, Otzel & Averaimo also known as Barton Gilman LLP, Cooke Law LLC, McCalla Raymer Liebert Pierce LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Costello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ospina v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 3:2014cv01694
Plaintiff:
Amparo Ospina
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Webstor Bank N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00883
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jack v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 3:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
Ella Maude Jack
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Hunt Leibert Jacobson PC, S. Bruce Fair and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Balgobin et al
as 3:2013cv00351
Defendant:
Gowkarran Balgobin and Millawatie Balgobin
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belcher v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 3:2009cv00757
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Belcher
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Tahisha Younger, Bridget Cusak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belcher v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 3:2009mc00137
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Belcher
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Tahisha Younger, Bridget Cusak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
