Cases 81 - 90 of 263
Robert Moten v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3839
Petitioner:
Robert J. Moten
Respondent:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
James Daniels, Jr. v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James E. Daniels, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs)
Walter McCullough v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3818
Petitioner:
Walter A. McCullough
Respondent:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Larry Norris)
Nicholas Tarkington v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas Tarkington
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Larry Burks v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3718
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Larry Gene Burks
Defendant - Appellant:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs)
Sherwood Gooch v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3680
Petitioner:
Sherwood V. Gooch
Respondent:
Wendy Kelley, Director Arkansas Department of Correction
Dexter Harmon v. Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 16-3579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dexter Harmon
Defendant - Appellee:
Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General, State of Arkansas, Bourgon B. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, State of Arkansas, Chris Piazza, Circuit Court Judge, Pulaski County and others
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Michael Jones v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael L. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Denver Mitchell, Jr. v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Denver W. Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
