Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States of America v. 811,549.41 in Bank Funds in Citibank Account 1187 et al
as 2:2023cv08774
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $811,549.41 in Bank Funds in Citibank Account '1187, $729,981.00 in Bank Funds in Cathay Bank Account '7026, $228,331.19 in Bank Funds in Citizens Bank Account '0334 and others
Claimant: Michael Ben Zidell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 43,590.79 in Bank Funds Seized from Two Wells Fargo Bank Accounts et al
as 2:2021cv01380
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Defendant: $43,590.79 IN BANK FUNDS SEIZED FROM TWO WELLS FARGO BANK ACCOUNTS, $11,621.10 IN BANK FUNDS SEIZED FROM ONE EAST WEST BANK ACCOUNT, 11,621.10 in Bank Funds Seized from One East West Bank Account and others
Claimant: Shaobo Yu, Queena Qi and Xin Qi
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. $180,000.00 In U.S. Currency Seized From One Safe Deposit Box At East West Bank and $113,272.00 In U.S. Currency
as 2:2021cv00788
Defendant: $180,000.00 In U.S. Currency Seized From One Safe Deposit Box At East West Bank and $113,272.00 In U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Guoxin Wu and Shi Ying Huang
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
USA v. Approximately $6,567,897.50 seized from CTBC Bank, Acct No. 3800191916 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00485
Defendant: Approximately $142,139.29 seized from Bank of America, Account Number 195461020, Approximately $9,004,531.62 seized from CTBC Bank, Account Number 3800283929, 18 Karat Fashion Ring, 1.66 Ct. oval/.070 Tw round diamonds and others
Claimant: Paulette Carpoff, Jeffrey Carpoff, Marquis Jet Partners, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. 103,668.46 USD IN Funds Seized From East West Bank Account 8739 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv07505
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Defendant: $103,668.46 IN FUNDS SEIZED FROM EAST WEST BANK ACCOUNT 8739 and 103,668.46 USD In Funds Seized From East West Bank Account 8739
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America et al v. $286,179.83 Seized From Three East West Bank Accounts et al
as 2:2014cv07131
Defendant: $286,179.83 Seized From Three East West Bank Accounts, $6,444.92 Seized From One National Financial Services LLC Brokerage Account, One 2011 Toyota Camry and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
United States of America v. $61,732.93 Seized from East West Bank Account Number XXX3383 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2013cv01562
Defendant: $13,051.59 Seized from East West Bank Account Number XXXX9490, $15,371.87 Seized from East West Bank Account Number XXXX0506 and $61,732.93 Seized from East West Bank Account Number XXX3383
Plaintiff: United States of America
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55417
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant: OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures
Claimant - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, ERICA M. KIM and others
Defendant: 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at
United States of America v. 93,760.07 In East West Bank Account Funds
as 2:2012cv01611
Defendant: 93,760.07 In East West Bank Account Funds
Plaintiff: United States of America
USA v. 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, et al
as 11-57042
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant: OPTIONAL CAPITAL, INC., AKA Optional Ventures
Claimant - Appellee: CHRISTOPHER KIM, AKA Chris Kim, AKA KJ Kim, AKA Kyung Joon Kim, BORA LEE, DAS CORPORATION, FKA Daebu Machinery Co., Ltd. and others
Defendant: 475 MARTIN LANE, BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA, Real Property Located at

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?