Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
West Flagler Associates, Ltd., et al v. DOI, et al
as 22-5022
Plaintiff / Appellee: West Flagler Associates, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, doing business as Magic City Casino and Bonita-Fort Myers Corporation, a Florida Corporation, doing business as Bonita Springs Poker Room
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of the Interior and Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
West Flagler Associates, Ltd., et al v. Governor of the State of Florida, et al
as 21-14141
Plaintiff / Appellant: WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP doing business as MAGIC CITY CASINO and BONITA-FORT MYERS CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION doing business as BONITA SPRINGS POKER ROOM
Defendant / Appellee: GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
West Flagler Associates, Ltd., et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-5265
Plaintiff / Appellee: West Flagler Associates, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, doing business as Magic City Casino and Bonita-Fort Myers Corporation, a Florida Corporation, doing business as Bonita Springs Poker Room
Defendant / Appellee: Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and United States Department of the Interior
Petitioner / Appellant: Seminole Tribe of Florida
Amicus Curiae: Monterra MF, LLC, Armando Codina, James Carr and others
WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. et al v. HAALAND et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02192
Plaintiff: WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. a Florida Limited Partnership d/b/a MAGIC CITY CASINO, BONITA-FORT MYERS CORPORATION a Florida Corporation d/b/a BONITA SPRINGS POKER ROOM, WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. a Florida Limited Partnership doing business as MAGIC CITY CASINO and others
Defendant: DEB HAALAND and DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Petitioner: SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES LTD et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2021cv00270
Defendant: Governor RONALD DION DESANTIS, Julie Imanuel Brown and RONALD DION DESANTIS
Plaintiff: West Flagler Associates, LTD doing business as Magic City Casino, Bonita-Fort Myers Corporation doing business as Bonita Springs Poker Room, WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES LTD A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP doing business as MAGIC CITY CASINO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. AXA XL INSURANCE GROUP et al
as 1:2020cv22989
Defendant: HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AXA XL INSURANCE GROUP, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. doing business as MAGIC CITY CASINO AND FLAGLER DOG TRACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. AXA XL INSURANCE GROUP et al
as 1:2020cv22990
Defendant: HALLMARK SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AXA XL INSURANCE GROUP, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. doing business as MAGIC CITY CASINO AND FLAGLER DOG TRACK and WEST FLAGLER ASSOCIATES, LTD. doing business as MAGIC CITY CASINO doing business as Flagler Dog Track
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
West Flagler Associates, Ltd. v. MCD Miami, LLC
as 1:2019cv22408
Defendant: MCD Miami, LLC
Plaintiff: West Flagler Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
West Flagler Associates, LTD v. City of Miami We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv21670
Defendant: City of Miami
Plaintiff: West Flagler Associates, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Herrera v. West Flagler Associates, LTD, et al
as 1:2017cv20872
Plaintiff: Frank Herrera
Defendant: West Flagler Associates, LTD , SW FL Enterprises, Inc. , BHH, Inc. and others
Mediator: Cindy Niad Hannah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?