Cases 1 - 10 of 23
US v. Cadden
as 21-2003
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
US v. Chin
as 21-1574
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GLENN A. CHIN
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
US v. Cadden
as 21-1602
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY J. CADDEN
Interested Party:
MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Gould, et al v. Morgan, et al
as 17-2202
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., CHRISTOPHER HART, SARAH ZESCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL C. O'LEARY, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, MARK MORGAN, Acting Chief of the Brookline Police Department and others
Petitioner:
ALAN B. MORRISON and JACK RAKOVE
Plaintiff:
IRWIN CRUZ and MARKUS VALLASTER
Defendant:
DAVID A. PROVENCHER, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the New Bedford Police Department
Jerry L. Conway, D.C. et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02002
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Conway, D.C. , Corey Musselman, M.D. , The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, L.L.P. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation, Cambia Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
In re: Pharmaceutical, et al
as 08-1055
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant / Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutica, et al, et al
as 08-8001
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Petitioner:
DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR., LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
Respondent:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, APOTHECON, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical, et al
as 08-1054
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, CARPENTERS & MILLWRIGHTS OF HOUSTON AND VICINITY WELFARE TRUST FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Carpenters & Millwrights of Houston and Vicinity Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees, Individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMRA JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Young, et al v. Bristol Myers Squibb Bristol-M, et al
as 08-1002
Not Classified By Court:
SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THERESE SHEPLEY and LARRY YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, WARRICK PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
