Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SUMAIR v. THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv00145
Defendant:
VIACOMCBS, SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, BELMONT BEHAVORIAL HOSPITAL, LLC and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
JASMINE SUMAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopkins et al v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01091
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc. , Standard Insulations, Inc., Borgwarner Morse TEC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Hopkins and Patricia Hopkins
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company and Veolia ES Industrial Services
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , 3M Company , BW/IP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Law v. Westinghouse Licensing Corporation et al
as 5:2011cv01412
Plaintiff:
Robert E Law
Defendant:
Westinghouse Licensing Corporation , Westinghouse Electric Company , Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and others
Intervenor:
Compsource Oklahoma
Cross_claimant:
Westinghouse Licensing Corporation , Westinghouse Electric Company , Westinghouse Electric Company LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
Martin Marietta Materials Inc , Schneider Electric USA Inc , Solomon Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ELLIS et al v. PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv66774
Plaintiff:
LINDA ELLIS
Defendant:
PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION , PNEUMO ABEX LLC , METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Pneumo Abex Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv01128
Plaintiff:
Linda Ellis
Defendant:
Pneumo Abex Corporation , Pneumo Abex LLC , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Farless et al v. Schindler Elevator Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Steven Farless and Julaine Farless
Defendant:
Schindler Elevator Corporation and Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
