Cases 1 - 10 of 580
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Kalthia Group Hotels v. Satterwhite
as 5:2024cv01846
Defendant:
DaCorey Satterwhite and DaCorey Satter White
Plaintiff:
Kalthia Group Hotels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Brenda White v. United States Of America
as 2:2024cv02159
Plaintiff:
Brendan White
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Marner et al v. U.S. Department of the Air Force et al
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Zachary Marner, Nevaeh Marner, Robert Shelder, Jr. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Air Force, Tom Ryan, Brittany Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
RM White LLC v. Ramirez
as 5:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
RM White LLC
Defendant:
Eliseo Ramirez doing business as Lalo's Shoe Repair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
