Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Childress v. CoreCivic et al
as 1:2021cv01148
Plaintiff:
James L. Childress
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Samuel Rodgers and Whiteville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Harris et al
as 1:2020cv01129
Defendant:
f/n/u Powell, f/n/u Trotter, f/n/u Harris and others
Plaintiff:
William Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv01083
Plaintiff:
Winfred Wright
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility, Matthews, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2015cv01072
Plaintiff:
Victor Clark
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility and Shantel White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hensley v. Whiteville Correctional Facility
as 1:2014cv01331
Plaintiff:
Corey Adam Hensley
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Jordan et al
as 1:2014cv01229
Plaintiff:
George Bryant
Defendant:
Jordan, Amos, Sherry Lindamood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Whiteville Correctional Facility Annex
as 2:2013cv02720
Petitioner:
Willie Thomas
Respondent:
Whiteville Correctional Facility Annex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pointer v. Corrections Corperation of America et al
as 1:2012cv01292
Plaintiff:
Cherrion Pollard Pointer
Defendant:
Corrections Corperation of America, Whiteville Correctional Facility and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tommie Hill, Jr. v. Whiteville Correctional Facili, et al
as 12-6476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMIE L. HILL, JR.
Respondent:
WHITEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et. al.
Respondent - Appellee:
LAURA MOORE, Job Coordinator and AMY TROTTER, Job Coordinator
Martinez v. Medical Department at Whiteville Correctional Facility
as 1:2012cv01175
Plaintiff:
Saul Martinez
Defendant:
Medical Department at Whiteville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
