Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Hicks v. Whitten
as 5:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Charles P Hicks
Defendant:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezell v. Cole et al
as 5:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
James Ezell, III
Defendant:
David Cole, FNU Russell, FNU Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Brown
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00123
Petitioner:
Byron Robinson
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Jerome Adrian David
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Defendant:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitten v. McCurtain County Jail Trust et al
as 6:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Marion Allen Whitten, Jr.
Defendant:
McCurtain County Jail Trust, Larry Hendrix, Joe LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Whitten
as 5:2022cv00880
Petitioner:
Jerry L Richards
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Worthington v. Whitten
as 4:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
David Paul Worthington
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitten v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Dennis Whitten
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
