Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Hicks v. Whitten
as 5:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Charles P Hicks
Defendant:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezell v. Cole et al
as 5:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
James Ezell, III
Defendant:
David Cole, FNU Russell, FNU Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Jerome Adrian David
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Defendant:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Whitten
as 5:2022cv00880
Petitioner:
Jerry L Richards
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Whitten et al
as 5:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Lester
Defendant:
Rick Whitten, Ms. V Howes, Mrs. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Revilla v. Whitten
as 5:2022cv00658
Petitioner:
Andrew J Revilla
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunn v. Crow et al
as 5:2022cv00436
Petitioner:
Michael R Dunn
Respondent:
Scott Crow and Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Folsom v. Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center et al
as 5:2021cv00906
Plaintiff:
Glen Folsom
Defendant:
FNU LNU, Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center, Mr. FNU Caram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folsom v. Internal Revenue Services et al
as 5:2021cv00789
Plaintiff:
Glen Folsom
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Services, North Fork Correctional Facility, Rick Whitten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folsom v. Pottawatomie County Courthouse et al
as 5:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
Glen Folsom
Defendant:
Pottawatomie County Courthouse, Beckham County Court, Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
