Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Jones v. Lamoille County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Lamoille County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zavalidroga v. Marshall et al
as 5:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Tomas Zavalidroga
Defendant:
Ryan Marshall, Rick Marshall, Town of Annsville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Addison County Sheriff's Department v. United States Office of Special Counsel
as 2:2018cv00143
Defendant:
United States Office of Special Counsel
Plaintiff:
Addison County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLeod v. Mickle et al
as 2:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Thomas McLeod
Defendant:
William Mickle, Barry Stokes, Two Unknown Forest Service LEOs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Stratton v. Rutland County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2015cv00262
Plaintiff:
Lisa Stratton
Defendant:
Rutland County Sheriff's Department, Rutland City Police Department, Trinity Episcopal Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Memphremagog Rentals et al
as 2:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
Daniel V. Kelley
Defendant:
Memphremagog Rentals , Douglas Spates , Orleans County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boisvert v. County of Bennington et al
as 2:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Gaston Boisvert
Defendant:
Bennington, County of, Bennington County Sheriff's Department, Chad Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
