Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
CBC Mortgage Agency v. TMRR et al
as 2:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
CBC Mortgage Agency
Defendant:
TMRR, Michael R. Whipple, Richard E. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Paparazzi v. Sorenson et al
as 4:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Paparazzi a Utah limited liability company doing business as Paparazzi Accessories
Defendant:
Melissa Sorenson, Geraldine Souza, Kylee Robinette and others
Counter Defendant:
Paparazzi
3Rd Party Defendant:
Misty Kirby, Trent Kirby, Chantel Reeve and others
Ferguson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Wendy Ferguson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Raland J. Brunson
Defendant:
Alma S. Adams, Pete Aguilar, Colin Z. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Emanuelson v. Grover et al
as 2:2018cv00971
Defendant:
Vinse Grover, Tom Means, FNU Rugebregt and others
Plaintiff:
Kristine Emanuelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Utah Highway Patrol et al
as 4:2018cv00057
Defendant:
Alex Garcia, UHP POST, Chris Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mecham v. Ferguson Enterprises et al
as 2:2016cv01149
Plaintiff:
William Earl Mecham
Defendant:
Ferguson Enterprises and Indian Ridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ferguson v. USA
as 2:2016cv00655
Petitioner:
Anthony Terrell Ray Ferguson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
