Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Salisbury v. Alexander et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Salisbury
Defendant:
Roderick Dante Alexander and Benin Logistics Group LLC
Other:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sewell v. Hanover Borough Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv01479
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Sewell
Defendant:
Hanover Borough Police Department and Zachariah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BENNETT v. J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03567
Plaintiff:
CAROL BENNETT
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. LLOYD, II and J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Traynham v. Shaw et al
as 1:2019cv00487
Defendant:
Lloyd S. Shaw and Mercer Transportation Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Willie Traynham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOYER et al v. MCGUINNESS
as 3:2016cv04382
Plaintiff:
LLOYD MOYER and TINA MOYER
Defendant:
JOHN MCGUINNESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
GARRIDO v. MORNIGNWAKE et al
as 2:2016cv00797
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE GARRIDO
Defendant:
GEORGE MORNIGNWAKE, LLOYD A. WILDONER , BRUNDAGE BONE AND BLANCHET, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodle et al v. Jones
as 3:2015cv01957
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hodle and Lisa Hodle
Defendant:
Christopher Lloyd Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barhight et al v. Curtis et al
as 3:2011cv02167
Plaintiff:
Margaret A. Barhight and August Barhight
Defendant:
Lloyd M. Curtis and Hartt Transportation Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACKLIN v. LLOYD et al
as 1:2010cv03717
Plaintiff:
ERIKA L. MACKLIN
Defendant:
JONATHAN W. LLOYD , TRANSCO, INC. , JOHN DOES I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILDNAUER et al v. NICOL et al
as 1:2009cv00307
Plaintiff:
LLOYD A. WILDNAUER and ELIZABETH WILDNAUER
Defendant:
KEVIN R. NICOL and MITY ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
