Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Moss v. Younkin et al
as 7:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Glen Younkin, John S. Edwards, R. Creigh Deeds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sampson v. Hutcharson et al
as 7:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Sampson
Defendant:
Sheriff Brian Hutcharson, Captain Jimmy Wimer, Rockingham County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox v. Newton et al
as 7:2021cv00429
Plaintiff:
Emanuel E. Maddox
Defendant:
Jeff Newton, Robyn Marshall, Mailroom (ETAL) Bostic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baber v. Neeley et al
as 7:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Sgt. Burt Shifflet, Sgt. Stacey Caplinger, Cpl. Brookman and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Baber, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Russell et al
as 7:2020cv00774
Defendant:
Officer Brown, Captain Keller, Superintendant Bobby Russell and others
Plaintiff:
Percell L. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00872
Defendant:
Joe Fannon, S.L. Escoffery, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Deondray Daniel Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lu v. Lynch et al
as 1:2015cv01100
Petitioner:
Ming Hui Lu
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch , Jeh Johnson , Michael Koransky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maddox v. Johnson
as 7:2010cv00344
Defendant:
Deputy Director Gene M. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Melvin Corey Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox v. Johnson et al
as 7:2009cv00179
Plaintiff:
Melvin Corey Maddox
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, Fred Shilling, Tracy S. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miska v. Middle River Regional Jail et al
as 7:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Miska
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail, Jack Lee, Vera Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
