Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Russell v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Ryan Russell
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Chris Thomas, Craig E. Boelte and others
Angel v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Kandy Angel
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Lowery v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Margaret J Lowery
Defendant:
Rachel Miller, Peter Rotskoff, Jose Lopez, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moon v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Chesley Moon
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Peters v. Sunflower Farmers Markets LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Jean Peters
Defendant:
Sunflower Farmers Markets LLC a foreign company doing business as Sprouts Farmers Markets, SF Markets LLC a foreign company doing business as SFM LLC and ABC Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cramer v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cramer v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Raymond Curtis Evans
Defendant:
Grady County Jail, United States Marshal Service, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
